Skip to main content

The Succession Readiness System

Five stages that define the capability your strategy needs, build it in your leaders through real work, and prove to your ExCo that it moved.

Most succession work stops at the plan: a talent review and a nine-box grid built on a thin slice of subjective impressions. It rarely uses evidence to show who your top talent really is, what would make them ready, or whether your leadership development spend is moving them any closer. It solves a governance problem, but leaves the business exactly where it was in strategic capability.

This is different. We identify the two or three core capabilities your strategy depends on, find out how strong your bench really is in them, and then build them – through guided experiences designed to transform how your leaders think and act, rather than theory that stays in the classroom. Then we have independent experts measure how capability, behaviour, readiness and ROI moved.

Succession readiness is evidence that the people on your plan can do the job your strategy will need – not just that their names are on it.

Before stage one, a number.

David Joshua mid-sentence, one hand raised, in a light blue jacket and open-necked white shirt, beside the Henley Business School Africa sign

Your CFO will fund talent development once they can see two things: what the capability gap is costing the business now, and what return an investment would make.

So we start there. In sixty minutes we build that number with you – in your figures, with every assumption written down for finance to test. There’s no fee and no obligation.

Most L&D budgets are defended in the language of activity. This session gives you the language of return on investment.

Five stages · select one

  1. Define your talent, and the capability your strategy demands of them.

    Your ExCo’s time is the most precious resource the business has – and who you put in the room with them is either career-limiting or career-enhancing. That’s why David runs every Talent Readiness Diagnostic himself. He has stood in billion-dollar boardrooms in front of executives who are not easily impressed, and come away with perfect feedback scores.

    David walks your ExCo through a process that uncovers the leadership capabilities your strategy depends on, and how strong your bench is at them – anonymously, on their devices, ranked live in the room, with a graphic illustration produced in real time. Because your executive team identify and agree the strategic competencies that are important but weak themselves, they own it, buy into it and champion it – rather than receiving it as one more L&D initiative to be reluctantly tolerated.

    What your ExCo agrees before they leave

    The capability mandate – which capabilities are both critical to the strategy and weak in your leadership bench, ranked in their own order of priority. The behaviour that has to change: what you want to see more of, and what you need to stop rewarding. And the beginnings of the problem set – the pressing business challenges your talent should be put to work on, surfaced by the executives who own them, and who are therefore invested in seeing them succeed.

    What gets built next, in the pre-accelerator phase

    The cohort for the accelerator, nominated against explicit criteria and assessed against the standard your ExCo has just set. And the problems they take on, selected from what your ExCo surfaced: real, unsolved, sponsored by an executive, and demanding the capabilities your strategy requires them to develop.

    Where you need it, we also develop a succession architecture with you. This is a role-criticality map, with success profiles written in observable behaviour, and capability definitions for the specific roles. This is specialist work, built with specialist partners, and scoped separately – because some organisations need the full architecture, and some only need their high potential talent made succession ready.

    “Feedback praised his energy, adaptability, presence, attentive listening, and ability to lead discussions... The results were very positive for the organization, and at the end the C-Suite [of a $bn organisation] gave David a perfect score.”

    Larissa Takayama
    L&D Lead · Wellhub

Where you enter

  • “Our talent bench isn’t ready to step up” → Define, then Assess
  • “We spend a fortune on leadership development and we can’t prove it works” → the value-at-stake session, then Define, Assess and Prove
  • “We reorganised, and half our leaders inherited teams that didn’t choose them” → Land, with Define where the restructure changed the strategy
  • “The board asked for our succession plan and it isn’t where it needs to be” → Define

The commercial terms

You’re only ever committed to the stage you’re in.

You pay for each stage before it begins, with its output agreed up front. When it ends, you decide whether to go on. If you’re not satisfied, for any reason, you stop there. The six-month accelerator is gated the same way, phase by phase.

Most firms need the whole programme signed up front, because that protects their revenue forecast. We don’t carry a utilisation target, so we’d rather earn each stage than lock in the next one.

“The value received far outweighs the cost of working with David.”

Anrico du Plessis
CEO · Multimedia

Start with a conversation.

Twenty minutes on what your leadership bench looks like, what your strategy is about to ask of it, and how you want to prepare your talent to close the gap.

No deck and no pitch. Just a clear view of where your bench is today, and what succession readiness looks like from here.

David Joshua, in a navy blazer and open-necked white shirt, in front of a bookcase
David JoshuaFounder, Resonance Leadership AdvisoryAssociate faculty, Henley Business School · Penguin-published author

In one sentence, what’s the problem?

No deck and no pitch, and you’ll leave the 20 minutes wiser on your succession strategy.